Cervical cancer is now largely preventable through HPV vaccination and screening, but about 14,000 people in the United States are diagnosed each year. Treatment typically involves surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or combinations of these. Research is focused on immunotherapy, targeted drugs, and better approaches for advanced or recurrent disease.
What's actually going on in research
Trials are testing immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab (already FDA-approved for some cervical cancers), antibody-drug conjugates that deliver chemotherapy directly to cancer cells, and combinations that may work better than current chemotherapy. Researchers are also studying ways to catch recurrence earlier and treat HPV-positive cancers that don't respond to standard therapy.
Antibody-drug conjugates
These drugs attach chemotherapy to antibodies that seek out cancer cells, sparing healthy tissue. Several are in late-stage trials for cervical cancer that has returned after treatment.
Immunotherapy combinations
Studies are pairing checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, radiation, or other immune drugs. The goal is to help more people respond and keep cancer controlled longer.
Therapeutic vaccines
Some trials are testing vaccines designed to train the immune system to attack HPV-infected cells. These differ from preventive HPV vaccines and aim to treat existing cancer.
What to know before you search
Eligibility typically depends on cancer stage, whether disease is newly diagnosed or recurrent, prior treatments received, and HPV status.
What types of trials are currently open
- Treatment trials — Testing new drugs or drug combinations for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, often comparing them to standard chemotherapy.
- Immunotherapy trials — Studies of checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, or cell therapies that activate the immune system against cancer.
- Radiation trials — Testing new radiation techniques or combinations with drugs to improve outcomes while reducing side effects.
- Surgical trials — Studies comparing surgical approaches, especially minimally invasive techniques, for early-stage disease.
- Maintenance trials — Testing whether continuing treatment after initial therapy can prevent or delay recurrence.
Recently added Cervical Cancer trials
Tissue Adhesive Versus Sutures in Oral Biopsy Closure
Excisional biopsies are commonly performed in the oral mucosa, and proper wound closure and hemostasis are critical for the success of the surgical procedure. Suturing remains the gold standard for closing surgical incisions; however, it has several drawbacks, including being time-consuming and requiring technical skill for proper placement. In addition, access to posterior areas of the oral cavity can be challenging. Suturing may also cause patient discomfort during needle penetration of tissues and can serve as a potential pathway for microbial contamination. Therefore, this randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate one of the latest tissue adhesives from the cyanoacrylate group (PeriAcryl 90 HV) compared to conventional surgical sutures (Nylon 4-0) for wound closure following oral excisional biopsies. A total of 28 patients with oral fibroma will be randomly assigned to either the tissue adhesive group or the suture group (14 patients per group).
Clinical Evaluation of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Implants for Facial Reconstruction.
This clinical study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of patient-specific 3D-printed titanium facial implants in the reconstruction and aesthetic correction of facial defects. The study will include patients presenting with congenital, traumatic, or post-surgical facial deformities requiring reconstructive intervention. Eligible participants will undergo preoperative clinical assessment and radiological imaging to design customized implants using computer-aided design (CAD) and 3D printing technology. The implants will be fabricated from medical-grade titanium and surgically placed according to standardized maxillofacial reconstructive protocols. Postoperative follow-up will assess functional outcomes, implant stability, complication rates, and aesthetic improvement over a defined observation period. Outcome evaluation will include clinical examination and patient-reported satisfaction measures. The objective of this study is to determine whether patient-specific 3D-printed titanium implants provide reliable functional restoration and improved aesthetic outcomes in facial reconstruction compared to conventional reconstructive techniques.
Find Cervical Cancer trials matched specifically to you
Answer 3 quick questions and we'll show you trials that fit your situation.