What the trial was testing
The mSToPS enrolled 6,135 patients with atrial fibrillation. The study was sponsored by Scripps Translational Science Institute and tracked outcomes across the full group of patients who matched the trial's eligibility profile.
Researchers followed patients through treatment and into recovery, tracking the outcomes that mattered most for the disease being studied.
What the results showed
3.9% vs. 0.9% — patch monitoring caught new AFib far more often.
JAMA · 2018 · NCT02506244
These findings — that new atrial fibrillation diagnoses at 4 months with patch monitoring vs. delayed start — were published in the JAMA and represent the headline result of the study.
Researchers tracked outcomes across 6,135 patients enrolled in the trial. The result was consistent enough across the group that the team felt confident reporting it.
What this means for patients
For patients with atrial fibrillation, this result changes the calculus on what to ask their care team about. Whether it changes day-to-day care depends on factors like disease subtype, prior treatments, and where the patient is in their care journey.
What you can do now
The Zio patch and similar 2-week ECG monitors are FDA-cleared and widely available with a doctor's prescription. Apple Watches and similar consumer wearables can also flag AFib. Ask your primary care doctor or cardiologist about screening if you have AFib risk factors.
Eligibility for the treatments mentioned above depends on specific test results and clinical history. Bring this summary, the trial name, and your most recent labs or pathology report to your next visit.
Open atrial fibrillation trials
Advancing Knowledge in Ischemic Stroke Patients on Oral Anticoagulants
The Advancing knowledge in ischemic Stroke PatiEnts on oRal Anticoagulants (ASPERA) study aims to investigate characteristics of ischemic stroke cases occurring in patients on oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF) or other cardioembolic arrhythmias and to characterize short and long-term outcomes associated with different secondary prevention strategies to prevent stroke recurrences. The ASPERA study is a multicenter, observational, both retrospective and prospective real-world study involving acute ischemic stroke patients occurring on oral anticoagulation. The study will encompass a retrospective (ASPERA-R) and prospective (ASPERA-P) data collection. Patient will be recruited consecutively at different emergency services and stroke units worldwide. University of L'Aquila (UnivAQ) will be in charge of study coordination, data analysis and management. The duration of ASPERA-R will be of 5-year from the study initiation of the study. Participating centers will be given a 6-month timeframe to enter retrospective data, commencing from the date of study approval. ASPERA-P duration will be of 2 years of enrollment from the study approval and follow-up of 5 years. (study conclusion after 7 years of approval). Inclusion criteria will be: 1.Confirmed diagnosis of ischemic stroke. 2. Availability of at least one neuroimaging exam positive for ischemic lesion(s) consistent with patient symptoms. 3. Ongoing oral anticoagulation at the time of the index ischemic stroke. 4. Prior diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or other cardioembolic arrhythmias. 5. Written informed consent provided by the patient himself or by proxy. Patients with Symptoms not indicative of acute stroke, ongoing intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulation at the time of stroke will be excluded. ASPERA-R: characterization of demographic, clinical and neuroimaging features of ischemic stroke cases occurring on oral anticoagulants. The primary outcome will be: ASPERA-R : characterization of demographic, clinical and neuroimaging features of ischemic stroke cases occurring on oral anticoagulants. ASPERA-P: risk of ischemic stroke recurrence of ischemic stroke cases occurring on oral anticoagulants across different secondary preventive strategies (i.e., maintaining the same type of oral anticoagulation versus switching to a different secondary prevention strategy) at 90 days, 1 and 5 years after the index stroke. Additionally, the study will aim to investigate the risk of safety events (hemorrhagic transformation, intracranial hemorrhage, other major bleeding events, any bleeding events, death due to any cause), risk of other major ischemic events (transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, death due to vascular causes) at each follow-up and to identify demographic, clinical and neuroimaging features of ischemic stroke recurrences.
QOL Improvement After Cardioversion of Persistent AF (QOL-CAFRCT)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a type of irregular heart rhythm due to electrical signal disturbances of the heart. It is a very common arrhythmia and the risk of developing AF increases with age and with other risk factors such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and underlying heart disease. The main complications of AF are heart failure and stroke. However, studies have shown that restoration of normal rhythm does not reduce these complications. Rather, these complications are mitigated by controlling the heart rate and using blood thinners to prevent stroke. Symptoms secondary to AF can occur due to the irregular heart rate and poor contraction in the atria, the top chambers of the heart. These symptoms include shortness of breath, fatigue, reduced exercise tolerance, and palpitations. Restoring sinus rhythm can sometimes alleviate these symptoms. Given that studies to date have not shown a difference in hard clinical endpoints between rate and rhythm control strategies, the decision to proceed with rhythm control depends on the patient symptom burden. Rhythm control strategies in patients with persistent AF include cardioversion back to sinus rhythm with long-term recurrence prevention via anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) or catheter ablation. However, many studies of these procedures omit a sham placebo control arm. No atrial fibrillation procedural intervention has been compared to a sham procedure. The cardioversion procedure can easily be compared to a "sham" alternative, as it is non-invasive with an expected response within days-to-weeks. Thus, a cardioversion versus "sham" cardioversion trial will allow us to truly assess the impact of a rhythm-control strategy on QOL. It is hypothesized that cardioversion of atrial fibrillation leads to significant improvement in quality of life (QOL) compared to sham cardioversion. Understanding the true QOL impact of sinus rhythm restoration in patients with persistent AF is of significant importance in guiding strategies for the management of AF. Hence, by evaluating what the true effect of cardioversion on QOL in this blinded study, we can better understand the role of medical management and AF ablation in our patients and assess resource allocation to these procedures.