What the trial was testing
The PRECISE enrolled 2,103 patients with coronary artery disease. The study was sponsored by HeartFlow, Inc. and tracked outcomes across the full group of patients who matched the trial's eligibility profile.
Researchers followed patients through treatment and into recovery, tracking the outcomes that mattered most for the disease being studied.
What the results showed
64% of low-risk patients never needed testing, and none had a heart attack or died.
JAMA cardiology · 2023 · NCT03702244
These findings — that far fewer patients had bad outcomes when testing was deferred for low-risk people — were published in the JAMA cardiology and represent the headline result of the study.
Researchers tracked outcomes across 2,103 patients enrolled in the trial. The result was consistent enough across the group that the team felt confident reporting it.
What this means for patients
For patients with coronary artery disease, this result changes the calculus on what to ask their care team about. Whether it changes day-to-day care depends on factors like disease subtype, prior treatments, and where the patient is in their care journey.
What you can do now
This approach is not yet standard practice. If you have chest pain but your doctor thinks your risk is very low, this study suggests it may be safe to wait on testing. Talk to your cardiologist about whether the PROMISE minimal risk score applies to you and whether deferring tests makes sense for your situation.
Eligibility for the treatments mentioned above depends on specific test results and clinical history. Bring this summary, the trial name, and your most recent labs or pathology report to your next visit.
Open coronary artery disease trials
Cardiac Power Output in Cardiogenic Shock Patients
The main purpose of this study is to determine whether differences in myocardial reserve predict clinical outcomes for heart failure patients.
Multicenter Real-World Cohort Study Evaluating the Impact of Early Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy on the Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients(ELITE-ACS)
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of early initiation of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy for intensive lipid-lowering in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during hospitalization on the rate of lipid goal attainment, the time to achieve guideline-recommended lipid levels within one year, and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. The primary research question is whether early initiation of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy during hospitalization for ACS patients in a real-world Chinese setting can increase the rate of lipid goal attainment, shorten the time to reach guideline-recommended lipid levels within one year, and improve the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Researchers will compare three lipid-lowering strategies: PCSK9 inhibitor therapy (with or without statins ± Ezetimibe/Hybutimibe), statin plus Ezetimibe/Hybutimibe therapy, and statin monotherapy, to assess the potential of PCSK9 inhibitor drugs in accelerating lipid goal achievement and reducing adverse cardiovascular events in ACS patients. Participants will: Receive PCSK9 inhibitor therapy (with or without daily statins ± Ezetimibe/Hybutimibe) every two weeks, or daily statin plus Ezetimibe/Hybutimibe therapy, or daily statin monotherapy. Undergo follow-up assessments of relevant laboratory indicators at baseline, 3 days after admission, discharge, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-discharge. Record the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events.