What the trial was testing
The IMPACT-BP enrolled 774 patients with hypertension. The study was sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital and tracked outcomes across the full group of patients who matched the trial's eligibility profile.
Researchers followed patients through treatment and into recovery, tracking the outcomes that mattered most for the disease being studied.
What the results showed
61% of patients who got home visits had their blood pressure under control, compared to 33% who went to clinics.
The New England journal of medicine · 2025 · NCT05492955
These findings — that patients who got home visits vs. 33% with clinic visits — were published in the The New England journal of medicine and represent the headline result of the study.
Researchers tracked outcomes across 774 patients enrolled in the trial. The result was consistent enough across the group that the team felt confident reporting it.
What this means for patients
For patients with hypertension, this result changes the calculus on what to ask their care team about. Whether it changes day-to-day care depends on factors like disease subtype, prior treatments, and where the patient is in their care journey.
What you can do now
If you live in a rural area and struggle to get to clinic appointments, this study shows home-based care can work better than traditional visits. A community health worker brings your medication and checks your blood pressure at home, with a nurse managing your treatment remotely. This approach is not widely available yet, but it could change how high blood pressure is treated in hard-to-reach communities.
Eligibility for the treatments mentioned above depends on specific test results and clinical history. Bring this summary, the trial name, and your most recent labs or pathology report to your next visit.
Open hypertension trials
Exercise-based Rehabilitation in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and severe disease characterized by elevation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) due to the narrowing of small pulmonary arteries. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) recommend supervised exercise-based rehabilitation as part of the treatment of PAH patients alongside optimal medical therapy (Level of evidence A, Class of recommendation I). Studies on exercise-based rehabilitation for PAH patients are limited, and most interventions have been conducted at least partially in hospital settings. Unlike more common cardiovascular diseases, there are no detailed international exercise guidelines tailored specifically for PAH patients. This study aims to verify that a group-based outpatient rehabilitation protocol suitable for the Finnish healthcare system improves exercise capacity, quality of life, and physical activity of PAH patients and is safe for appropriately selected patients. Additionally, the study aims to determine whether PAH patients adhere to regular exercise training and whether physical activity increases in the long term. The goal is to assess whether an outpatient rehabilitation protocol, designed for the Finnish healthcare system, can achieve similar results to those observed in previous international studies. The primary outcome measure is the change in the six-minute walking distance (6MWD) compared to the patient's baseline. Long-term 6MWD data are often available for patients. The 6MWD is the most commonly used primary outcome in randomized and controlled PAH drug trials, and improvements in this test have been the basis for drug approvals. An improvement of 33 meters in the 6MWD is considered clinically significant, and the goal is to achieve this change with group-based outpatient rehabilitation. Secondary outcomes include changes in quality of life (SF-36), WHO functional class, NT-proBNP levels, echocardiographic parameters, ESC/ERS risk-stratification score (four-strata model), muscle strength, respiratory measures, balance, daily step count, and insomnia severity.
Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CKD-202A
Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CKD-202A(Sacubitril∙Valsartan)