Plain-English translation of NCT02208388 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
This trial is testing whether computed tomography perfusion (a type of CT heart scan) is as safe and effective as another procedure called fractional flow reserve at helping doctors decide which heart blockages need treatment. Both methods are used to determine if a blockage in your coronary arteries is severe enough to require intervention. The study will enroll 1,000 patients to compare how well these two approaches guide treatment decisions.
When doctors find a blockage in your heart arteries, they need to decide whether to treat it or monitor it. Currently, one method (fractional flow reserve) requires an invasive catheter procedure, while the other (computed tomography perfusion) is a non-invasive imaging scan. This study is trying to determine whether the imaging scan alone works just as well, which could mean fewer invasive procedures for patients.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
You would be randomly assigned to have your heart blockage evaluated using one of two methods: either a CT perfusion scan or a fractional flow reserve procedure. After this evaluation, your doctor will use the results to guide treatment decisions. The study will follow you to track how safe and effective each approach is at helping doctors make the right treatment choice for your heart condition.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 2, 2026 · Not medical advice
South Korea