Plain-English translation of NCT05027984 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
Read our Coronary Artery Disease research guide →This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
After a heart attack, patients often have multiple narrowings in their heart arteries. This trial compares two different approaches to decide which partial blockages need treatment: one uses special imaging called optical coherence tomography (OCT) to look at the plaque inside the artery and identify risky plaques, while the other uses a functional test (FFR) that measures blood flow. The goal is to see which approach leads to better outcomes.
When patients have partial blockages that are not causing the heart attack, doctors are unsure whether treating these blockages prevents future heart attacks and deaths. Current guidelines suggest using flow-based testing, but recent evidence suggests that looking directly at plaque characteristics with imaging might identify which patients truly need treatment.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
You will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups receive heart catheterization, where a thin tube is guided to your heart arteries. One group will have special imaging (OCT) performed to look at your artery plaques, and treatment decisions will be based on what the imaging shows. The other group will have a flow test (FFR) performed instead. Depending on what is found, you may receive a stent (a small metal scaffold) in a partial blockage. You will then be followed over time to track your health outcomes.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 2, 2026 · Not medical advice
Greece
Italy