Plain-English translation of NCT05264831 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
This trial is testing two different surgical approaches to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (a condition where your heart beats irregularly and too fast) in patients whose hearts did not respond to electrical cardioversion (a shock treatment used to restore normal heartbeat). One approach uses a procedure called pulmonary vein isolation alone, while the other combines that procedure with additional tissue modification. The trial aims to determine which approach works better and has fewer complications.
Atrial fibrillation is becoming more common as people live longer, and it can lead to serious complications like stroke. While pulmonary vein isolation is recommended as a first-line treatment, it only works for about 40–60% of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. This trial exists to find out whether adding extra tissue modification improves success rates without causing unnecessary harm to patients who might have improved with the simpler procedure alone.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
If you qualify and your heart does not return to normal rhythm after electrical cardioversion, you will be randomly assigned to receive one of two surgical procedures: pulmonary vein isolation alone, or pulmonary vein isolation combined with additional tissue modification. The procedure will be performed 4–6 weeks after your cardioversion treatment. You will need to attend follow-up appointments to monitor your heart rhythm and overall recovery after the procedure.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 7, 2026 · Not medical advice
France