Plain-English translation of NCT05711186 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
This trial is testing whether a structured approach to shared decision-making helps patients make better choices about their heart valve treatment. You have severe aortic stenosis (a narrowing of the heart's aortic valve), and your doctors have determined that you could safely have either surgical valve replacement or a less invasive catheter-based valve replacement. This study compares whether a more organized, patient-centered way of discussing your options improves your satisfaction and confidence in whichever treatment you choose.
Both surgical and catheter-based valve replacements are effective, but they differ in important ways—such as how invasive they are, how long recovery takes, and long-term durability. Guidelines recommend that patients' own values and preferences should guide this choice, but many patients feel confused or overwhelmed by the decision. This trial tests whether structured, organized decision-making support helps patients feel more confident and satisfied with their choice.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
If you join this trial, you will be randomly assigned to either receive structured shared decision-making support (a more organized, step-by-step approach to discussing your treatment options with your doctors) or standard care (the usual way your doctors discuss options with you). Both groups will ultimately proceed with whichever valve replacement treatment you and your heart team decide is best for you. The trial will track your satisfaction, confidence, and outcomes related to your decision-making experience.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 22, 2026 · Not medical advice
Switzerland