Plain-English translation of NCT05966675 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
After some patients have a catheter-based aortic valve replacement procedure, their heart's electrical system can be disrupted, requiring a pacemaker. This trial compares two ways of placing a permanent pacemaker: a newer method called conduction system pacing (which aims to work more naturally with your heart) versus the standard pacing methods currently used. The goal is to see which approach better protects your heart's pumping function long-term.
Standard pacemakers work well for many patients, but doctors believe the newer conduction system pacing method might preserve the heart's natural electrical pathways better and prevent future heart muscle weakness. This trial will test whether that theory holds true.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
You will be randomly assigned to receive either the newer conduction system pacing method or the standard pacemaker approach. Your doctors will then monitor your heart's function over time through follow-up visits and tests to compare how well each method works. The study is taking place at multiple medical centers and will enroll about 500 patients total.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Aug 9, 2026 · Not medical advice
Poland