Plain-English translation of NCT06038227 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
Read our Lung Cancer research guide →This study is comparing two different minimally invasive surgical techniques for treating early-stage lung cancer: robotic-assisted surgery and video-assisted surgery. Both approaches allow doctors to remove lung tissue through small incisions rather than one large one. The study wants to understand which approach works best for patients and how quickly people recover after each type of surgery.
Lung cancers are now being caught at earlier stages thanks to better screening, and research shows that removing a smaller portion of the lung (called segmentectomy) works just as well as removing an entire section (called lobectomy) for very small tumors. Robotic surgery might make the more complex segmentectomy procedure easier and safer, but doctors need real-world evidence to know which technique is best for individual patients.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
If you join this study, you would receive minimally invasive lung cancer surgery—either robotic-assisted or video-assisted—depending on what your surgical team recommends. You would then participate in follow-up visits where researchers track how well you recover, how you feel, and how quickly you return to normal activities. The study collects information about your surgery, recovery, and quality of life to help doctors understand which technique works best for patients like you.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 6, 2026 · Not medical advice
Denmark
France
Germany