Plain-English translation of NCT06094660 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
This trial tests whether two types of nerve ablation—a minimally invasive procedure that uses heat or chemical injection to reduce pain signals from nerves around the knee—works better than conservative treatments like physical therapy and medication for people with severe knee osteoarthritis pain. You'll be randomly assigned to receive either radiofrequency ablation, chemical neurolysis with phenol, or conservative treatment over six months, and researchers will track how much your pain improves and how well your knee functions.
Many people with severe knee osteoarthritis aren't ready for knee replacement surgery, but conservative treatments alone don't always relieve their pain. This study fills a gap by comparing nerve ablation—a less invasive option—to standard care to see if it can bridge that gap for patients waiting for surgery or unable to have it.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
If you enroll, you'll be randomly assigned to one of three groups: radiofrequency nerve ablation, chemical nerve ablation with phenol, or conservative treatment (physical therapy, pain medication, and education). The procedure groups will receive their treatment as an outpatient visit, while the conservative group will continue with standard care. All participants will be monitored for six months with follow-up visits and pain/function assessments to measure how well the treatment works.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 9, 2026 · Not medical advice
Netherlands