Plain-English translation of NCT06220058 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
Read our Colorectal Cancer research guide →This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
This study is testing two different surgical closure techniques for patients undergoing emergency surgery on their colon or rectum. One method uses a careful stitching technique called "small bites," while the other combines small bites stitching with a supportive mesh patch placed under the skin. The trial wants to find out which approach better prevents incisional hernias—bulges that can develop through the surgical scar—and reduces other wound complications.
After abdominal surgery, hernias (tissue bulging through the healed incision) are a common problem that can require additional surgery. Medical guidelines don't currently recommend one closure method over another for emergency colorectal surgery because there isn't enough reliable evidence comparing these techniques in urgent situations.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
If you enroll, you will undergo emergency surgery for your colorectal condition. During surgery, your surgical team will randomly assign you to one of two closure techniques—either the standard small bites method or the small bites method with an added mesh reinforcement. After surgery, you will be followed to monitor how well your incision heals and whether you develop any complications like hernias or infections.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Aug 14, 2026 · Not medical advice
Spain