Plain-English translation of NCT06537193 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated ·
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
This study is testing whether an abbreviated MRI scan using a contrast dye called gadoxetic acid is as good as—or better than—a CT scan at finding signs that liver cancer has returned in people who had successful treatment. You would receive both types of imaging scans during the trial so researchers can directly compare how well each one detects cancer recurrence. This head-to-head comparison will help doctors choose the best screening tool for patients like you in the future.
After liver cancer treatment, patients need regular monitoring to catch any signs of recurrence early. Currently, both MRI and CT scans are used, but it's unclear which one is more effective and efficient for this job. This study will help doctors understand which imaging method is best for keeping watch over people who have been treated for liver cancer.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
You would undergo two rounds of imaging testing over about 4 to 8 months apart. Each round includes both an MRI scan (where you receive an injection of gadoxetic acid dye before the scan) and a CT scan (where you receive iodine contrast dye). If any suspicious spots are found, you would return for additional confirmation imaging. After completing both rounds of scans, you would continue in clinical follow-up for at least 6 more months so researchers can track whether cancer returns.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 24, 2026 · Not medical advice
South Korea