Plain-English translation of NCT06702735 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
Some children with asthma don't feel their symptoms accurately — they might feel fine when their lungs are actually working poorly, or feel terrible when their lungs are doing okay. This study tests whether a tool called the Rainbow tool can help children and their doctors understand this mismatch better. The Rainbow tool uses colors to show how a child's actual lung function compares to what they report feeling, and the study checks whether regular feedback sessions can help kids learn to recognize their symptoms more accurately.
Children with asthma often can't tell how well their lungs are working just by how they feel. This can be dangerous — a child might skip sports or activities when they're fine, or miss warning signs of a serious problem. This trial wants to see if teaching children about this mismatch through the Rainbow tool and regular check-ins can help them become more aware of their real symptoms.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
You'll start with a selection phase where you'll blow into a lung function device several times and rate how you're feeling using a simple scale. If you show signs of not recognizing your symptoms well, you'll move to the intervention phase. There, you'll continue measurements and may receive feedback sessions with a doctor or nurse using the Rainbow tool to help you understand the connection between your lung function and symptoms. The study compares three groups: one getting regular feedback, one learning about the tool but not getting feedback sessions, and one doing standard care only.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 26, 2026 · Not medical advice
Netherlands