Plain-English translation of NCT06844604 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
Hospitals produce significant greenhouse gas emissions, and operating rooms are major contributors. This study compares three surgical approaches for colorectal procedures—robotic-assisted, laparoscopic (minimally invasive with small cuts), and traditional open surgery—to measure and understand which method has the smallest environmental impact. By identifying which techniques and equipment generate the most carbon emissions, researchers hope to find practical ways hospitals can reduce their environmental footprint.
While surgeons know these three surgical approaches work, no one has carefully compared how much carbon and resources each one uses. Understanding these differences could help hospitals make choices that are better for the environment without compromising your care.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
If you qualify and choose to participate, you would undergo your planned colorectal surgery as your doctor has already recommended. The study team would simply observe and measure the resources, energy, and materials used during your operation—things like electricity, equipment, gases, and supplies. You would not receive any additional procedures or treatments; the researchers are only collecting information about your standard surgical care to compare environmental impacts across the three surgical approaches.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Oct 12, 2026 · Not medical advice
Switzerland