Plain-English translation of NCT06880978 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study compares two stent placement techniques—mini-crush and controlled balloon-crush—that doctors use to treat complex blockages in coronary arteries (the blood vessels that supply your heart). Both techniques involve placing stents (small metal scaffolds) to keep blocked arteries open, but they use slightly different approaches to do so. Researchers want to see which technique works better and is easier for doctors to perform.
The mini-crush technique has been used successfully for many years, but it can be technically challenging for doctors to perform, especially when trying to position the second stent properly. The controlled balloon-crush technique is newer and may be easier to use while keeping the stents in place just as effectively, so this study will help determine if it's a real improvement.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
If you join this study, you will receive your stent procedure using one of the two techniques as part of your normal heart care—the study doesn't change your treatment, just tracks how well each technique works. You will be followed up at 1 year with clinic visits and tests to assess how well the stent is working and whether you have had any heart-related complications. The study involves 400 patients being treated at the hospital, and researchers will compare the results between the two groups.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jul 19, 2026 · Not medical advice
Turkey (Türkiye)