Plain-English translation of NCT06950515 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
Doctors need to diagnose small lung lesions (abnormal areas in the lungs) that can't be seen with standard methods. This trial is testing whether a lung biopsy procedure works better when patients are under full general anesthesia (completely asleep) versus conscious sedation (lightly sedated but able to breathe on their own). The goal is to figure out which approach helps doctors get better diagnostic samples while keeping patients as comfortable and safe as possible.
When a patient has a small lung lesion that may be cancer or another serious condition, doctors need a tissue sample to know what's really going on. However, the procedure to get that sample can be uncomfortable and challenging. This trial is trying to determine which sedation method gives doctors the best chance of successfully diagnosing the problem while making the experience as safe and tolerable as possible for patients.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
You'll have an initial visit where a doctor explains the study and gets your consent—this can happen in person, by phone, or by video. You'll then be randomly assigned to receive the procedure under either general anesthesia or conscious sedation. On your procedure day, you'll undergo the lung biopsy using your assigned sedation method, and before you leave, you'll answer questions about your comfort. The research team will follow up with your medical records one month later to check your results and make sure you had no complications, and they may check in again at 1 and 2 years if the initial biopsy wasn't fully diagnostic.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Jun 3, 2026 · Not medical advice
Canada