Plain-English translation of NCT07129512 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ · Source last updated · Translation generated · How we translate trials
This study doesn't follow the usual testing phases — it may be an observational study or a different type of research.
This study compares two different ways surgeons can stop bleeding during laparoscopic (minimally invasive) surgery to remove colon cancer. One group will have their blood vessels sealed using an ultrasonic scalpel, while the other group will have vessels tied off using traditional surgical clips and energy devices. Researchers want to see which method is safer and works better for patients.
During colon cancer surgery, surgeons need to carefully seal blood vessels to prevent bleeding. The newer ultrasonic method might be faster and cause less tissue damage, but doctors need to test whether it's truly as safe and effective as the traditional clipping method that has been used for many years.
You likely qualify if…
You likely don't qualify if…
If you join, you'll be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical methods on the day of your operation. Your surgeon will perform laparoscopic colon cancer surgery using either the ultrasonic tool or traditional clipping technique. You'll have a follow-up visit 30 days after surgery, and then continue with standard colon cancer follow-up care. The entire study lasts about 5 years from start to finish, with enrollment happening over the first 18 months.
AI-generated summary from trial data · Aug 2, 2026 · Not medical advice
South Korea