Osteoporosis weakens bones to the point where they fracture easily, often in the spine, hip, or wrist. It affects about 10 million Americans, mostly women after menopause. Current treatments include bisphosphonates like alendronate, denosumab injections, and newer bone-building drugs like romosozumab and abaloparatide.
What's actually going on in research
Trials are testing drugs that build bone faster or prevent loss more completely, including modified versions of parathyroid hormone and sclerostin inhibitors. Researchers are studying how to identify fracture risk earlier, whether existing drugs work better in combination, and treatments that might rebuild bone density in people who've already fractured.
Bone-building agents
Newer drugs like romosozumab block sclerostin, a protein that limits bone formation. Trials are testing whether these drugs reduce fractures more than older medications, and whether combining them with other treatments works better.
Fracture prevention strategies
Studies are looking at whether treating people at moderate fracture risk prevents breaks before they happen. This includes testing combinations of bone-building drugs followed by drugs that maintain density.
Biomarker research
Researchers are working to identify which people will fracture before their bone density scans look severe. Blood tests measuring bone turnover may help predict who needs aggressive treatment.
What to know before you search
Eligibility typically depends on bone density scores, history of fractures, age, menopause status for women, and prior osteoporosis treatments.
What types of trials are currently open
- Treatment trials — Testing new osteoporosis drugs or comparing existing ones to see which best prevents fractures or builds bone density.
- Combination therapy trials — Testing whether using two drugs together—often a bone-builder followed by a drug that preserves density—works better than single treatments.
- Prevention trials — Enrolling people with low bone density but no fractures yet, to see if early treatment prevents breaks.
- Post-fracture trials — Testing treatments in people who've already broken a bone, when fracture risk is highest.
- Observational studies — Following people on osteoporosis treatment to learn which factors predict fractures and treatment response.
Recently added Osteoporosis trials
Bone Deterioration After Kidney Transplantation Assessed by DXA and HR-pQCT
The goal of this observational study is to learn how bone health changes during the first year after kidney transplantation in adults receiving their first kidney transplant. The main questions it aims to answer are: * How many patients show a clinically relevant decline in bone density or bone structure within 12 months after transplantation? * Does a standard bone density scan (DXA) detect these changes as well as a high-resolution scan of bone structure (HR-pQCT)? Participants will: * Have a DXA scan of the lower spine, hip and forearm and an HR-pQCT scan of the forearm and lower leg shortly after transplantation and again after 12 months. Participants followed up in Innsbruck may also have these scans after 6 months. * Give blood and urine samples at the same visits, taken together with routine blood tests whenever possible, for bone and mineral markers and storage in a biobank. The study does not change any treatment. All treatment decisions remain with the patients' physicians.
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
This study is designed as a prospective, post-market, multi-center, single-arm study to collect real-world data of the VCFix Spinal System used in US clinical practice. Approximately 5 centers in the US will enroll subjects with VCF in a non-randomized fashion, and VCFix will be used within its cleared purpose and indications for use. The study has been designed to be methodologically compatible with the EU EXPAND (CIP-VS02-EU) study, thereby aiming for the pooling of data to the EU study. Data pooling will be pursued only as a sensitivity analysis if pre-specified similarity criteria are met. The US study provides meaningful real-world evidence regardless of pooling feasibility. The targeted patient population, assessment schedule, and study endpoints are therefore similar to those of the EU EXPAND study.
Find Osteoporosis trials matched specifically to you
Answer 3 quick questions and we'll show you trials that fit your situation.