Pulmonary embolism occurs when a blood clot blocks an artery in the lungs, typically traveling from a deep vein in the leg. It affects roughly 1 in 1,000 Americans each year and can be life-threatening. Treatment has long centered on anticoagulants to prevent new clots, but research now explores clot removal devices, better risk prediction, and ways to prevent long-term lung damage.
What's actually going on in research
Trials are testing catheter-based clot removal for massive PE, comparing newer oral anticoagulants like apixaban and rivaroxaban to warfarin, studying shorter treatment durations for low-risk patients, and examining whether early intervention prevents chronic lung problems. Researchers are also working on better ways to identify who's at high risk for recurrence and who can safely stop anticoagulation.
Catheter-directed treatment
Devices that break up or remove large clots directly from the lungs may help patients with massive PE who can't take clot-busting drugs. Several systems are FDA-approved, and trials are comparing them to standard anticoagulation alone.
Shorter treatment
Studies are testing whether some patients can stop anticoagulants after three or six months instead of the traditional six to twelve months. The goal is to reduce bleeding risk without increasing clot recurrence.
Chronic complications
Researchers are studying why some people develop lasting shortness of breath and high lung pressure after PE. Trials are testing whether early aggressive treatment prevents this chronic damage.
What to know before you search
Eligibility typically depends on PE severity, how recently it occurred, other clotting risk factors, kidney function, and bleeding risk.
What types of trials are currently open
- Device trials — Testing catheters and other tools that physically remove or break up clots in the lungs, usually for large or high-risk PE.
- Anticoagulation trials — Comparing different blood thinners, treatment durations, or dosing strategies to find the best balance between preventing clots and avoiding bleeding.
- Prevention trials — Testing whether extended anticoagulation prevents recurrent clots in high-risk patients, or studying risk prediction tools to guide treatment decisions.
- Post-PE studies — Following patients after PE to understand long-term outcomes, including chronic shortness of breath, exercise capacity, and quality of life.
Recently added Pulmonary Embolism trials
Complete a blood clotting test before and after brain tumor surgery
The objective of our study is to investigate the clinical significance of thromboelastometric values in the development of thrombotic events and survival in patients with glial tumors, to reduce thromboembolic complications and optimize oncological treatment.
Share your emergency visit data to validate a new risk assessment tool
Background: The 2026 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Pulmonary Embolism Guideline (Creager et al., Circulation 2026) introduced a novel five-category (A-E) clinical classification system with subcategories and an R modifier, replacing prior risk stratification frameworks. Prospective validation of this classification system using composite clinical outcomes is lacking. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of the 2026 AHA/ACC clinical categorization (Categories A-E plus R modifier) for predicting 30-day Major Adverse Pulmonary Embolism Events (MAPEE) in emergency department (ED) patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: Prospective observational cohort study conducted at Marmara University Faculty of Medicine Emergency Department, enrolling 600 consecutive adult patients with confirmed acute PE by computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography between April 2026 and January 2027. Primary outcome: MAPEE composite (all-cause mortality OR hemodynamic deterioration OR treatment escalation OR cardiopulmonary resuscitation) within 30 days. Secondary outcomes include area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) comparison with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2019 risk stratification (exploratory), negative predictive value (NPV) of low-risk categories (A+B) for safe discharge, MAPEE trend across C1/C2/C3, and R modifier odds ratio. Statistical analysis: Jamovi v2.x. Reporting follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) 2007 checklist.
Find Pulmonary Embolism trials matched specifically to you
Answer 3 quick questions and we'll show you trials that fit your situation.