stella
Ovarian CancerJuly 2019Summary reviewed August 2026

A Cancer Drug Worked Just as Well as a Monthly Shot vs. an IV

Researchers tested whether an immunotherapy drug could be given as a monthly injection under the skin instead of through an IV every few weeks. The shot worked just as well — 18% of patients saw their tumors shrink — and caused fewer serious side effects. This could make treatment more convenient for people with advanced cancer.

What the trial was testing

The trial enrolled 147 patients with ovarian cancer. The study was sponsored by Pfizer and tracked outcomes across the full group of patients who matched the trial's eligibility profile.

It was an early-stage trial — researchers are still confirming safety and getting an early look at how well the treatment works. Trials at this stage are designed to produce evidence regulators and physicians can act on — not just observations to follow up later.

What the results showed

18% of patients saw their tumors shrink with either the IV or the monthly injection.

JAMA oncology · 2019 · NCT02573259

These findings — that saw their tumors shrink with the monthly injection or IV — were published in the JAMA oncology and represent the headline result of the study.

Researchers tracked outcomes across 147 patients enrolled in the trial. The result was consistent enough across the group that the team felt confident reporting it.

What this means for patients

For patients with ovarian cancer, this result changes the calculus on what to ask their care team about. Whether it changes day-to-day care depends on factors like disease subtype, prior treatments, and where the patient is in their care journey.

What you can do now

This study showed that a monthly shot under the skin can work as well as an IV for delivering immunotherapy. The shot caused fewer serious side effects and could be easier for patients who prefer to avoid frequent clinic visits. This treatment is still in early testing and is not yet FDA-approved. Ask your doctor about open trials or related approved options.

Eligibility for the treatments mentioned above depends on specific test results and clinical history. Bring this summary, the trial name, and your most recent labs or pathology report to your next visit.

Open ovarian cancer trials

RecruitingInterventional study

ULTRA-LAP Trial: Laparoscopic Debulking Surgery (LDS) in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

ULTRA-LAP is a prospective study is to investigate the safety, efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic debulking surgery (LDS) for the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The outcomes to measure are: * Safety: the rate of patients experiencing intra- and post-operative early and late morbidities (within the hospitalization and up to 60 days from surgery) * Efficacy: the rate of patients in which the surgical target set pre-operatively (complete resection) is achieved by laparoscopy. * Feasibility: the rate of patients who have their procedure completed by laparoscopy Patients will undergo laparoscopic debulking surgery (LDS) if the surgical target can be met. If it cannot be achieved by laparoscopy the surgeon will convert to laparotomy.

Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy
RecruitingInterventional study

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Obese Women With Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome

This prospective, two-stage clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and reproductive outcomes of oral Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) freeze-dried capsules in overweight and obese patients with Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (PMOS) undergoing Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer (FET).The study is implemented in two sequential phases: Phase Ⅰ (Pilot Exploration): A prospective, open-label, single-arm exploratory study in an initial evaluable cohort (n=11) to evaluate preliminary safety, dynamic gut microbiota colonization, endocrine/metabolic parameters, and pregnancy outcomes following FET. Phase Ⅱ (Confirmatory RCT): A planned multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to validate the clinical efficacy and underlying mechanisms of oral FMT capsules compared with control interventions, based on findings established in Phase Ⅰ.

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China