stella
Colorectal CancerMay 2023Summary reviewed August 2026

Two-Drug Combo Extended Life by 3 Months for Advanced Colon Cancer Patients

Patients with advanced colon cancer that had stopped responding to treatment lived a median of 10.8 months on a two-drug combo, compared to 7.5 months on one drug alone. The combo also delayed cancer growth and kept patients feeling stronger for longer.

What the trial was testing

The SUNLIGHT enrolled 492 patients with colorectal cancer. The study was sponsored by Taiho Oncology, Inc. and tracked outcomes across the full group of patients who matched the trial's eligibility profile.

It was a large trial designed to confirm whether the treatment works well enough for wider use. Trials at this stage are designed to produce evidence regulators and physicians can act on — not just observations to follow up later.

What the results showed

Patients on the two-drug combo lived 3.3 months longer than those on one drug alone.

The New England journal of medicine · 2023 · NCT04737187

These findings — that patients lived 3.3 months longer on the two-drug combo than on one drug alone — were published in the The New England journal of medicine and represent the headline result of the study.

Researchers tracked outcomes across 492 patients enrolled in the trial. The result was consistent enough across the group that the team felt confident reporting it.

What this means for patients

For patients with colorectal cancer, this result changes the calculus on what to ask their care team about. Whether it changes day-to-day care depends on factors like disease subtype, prior treatments, and where the patient is in their care journey.

What you can do now

This combo is now an FDA-approved option for advanced colon cancer that has stopped responding to other treatments. If you're in this situation, ask your oncologist whether this combo might work for you. The study showed it extended life and delayed disease progression, though side effects like low white blood cell counts and nausea were common.

Eligibility for the treatments mentioned above depends on specific test results and clinical history. Bring this summary, the trial name, and your most recent labs or pathology report to your next visit.

Open colorectal cancer trials

RecruitingSafety & dosing

A Study of BL-B01D1 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Tumor and Other Solid Tumor

In phase Ia study, the safety and tolerability of BL-B01D1 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal tumor and other solid tumor will be investigated to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BL-B01D1. In phase Ib study, the safety and tolerability of BL-B01D1 at the phase Ia recommended dose will be further investigated, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for phase II clinical studies will be determined. In addition, the preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and immunogenicity of BL-B01D1 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal tumor and other solid tumor will be evaluated.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China +5 more
RecruitingObservational study

New bioMarkers tO straTIfy cOlorectal caNcer Referrals

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate if a blood test for circulating progastrin (hPG80) and transposable elements (TEs) can accurately predict colorectal cancer (CRC) or polyps in adult patients referred to the 2-week wait (2WW) or Straight to Test (STT) pathways for suspected lower gastrointestinal cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can plasma hPG80 levels accurately predict a diagnosis of CRC or polyps in patients undergoing standard 2WW investigations? Can transposable elements (TEs) in the plasma serve as predictive biomarkers for CRC diagnosis in these patients? What are the patient preferences for different diagnostic tests for CRC, particularly a blood-based test compared to more invasive methods? Participants will: Provide a 20ml blood sample during a routine hospital visit for their 2WW diagnostic test (e.g., colonoscopy, CT Colon). Undergo standard clinical investigations as determined by their treating clinicians. Have their final diagnosis (cancer, polyp, or normal) correlated with their plasma hPG80 levels. For a subset of 100 participants (25 with confirmed CRC, 75 non-cancer), have their plasma analyzed for circulating signatures using RNAseq and DNAseq. Complete an electronic post-study questionnaire to explore their preferences and experiences with different CRC diagnostic tests used within the 2WW pathway.

London, England, United Kingdom